SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL JOURNAL

| укр | рус |

 

 


No3(3) 2020

Back to the issue


DOI 10.37219/2528-8253-2020-3-30

Shkorbotun Ya.V.
Treatment tactics the maxillary sinuses cysts of patients to whom dental implantation is planned
Shkorbotun Yaroslav V
State Institution of Science "Research and Practical Center of Preventive and Clinical Medicine" State Administrative Department, Department of miniinvasive surgery, Kyiv, Ukraine
Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Department of Otolaryngology, Kyiv, Ukraine
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor
lorkiev@ukr.net
Orchid ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3103-7194

Abstract

Introduction: The modern strategy of the treatment of maxillary sinus cysts provides for the surgery in cases of clinically significant cysts, and in other cases – observation. When performing sinuslifting, cysts of the maxillary sinuses are a risk factor for complications.
The objective of the study: to increase the effectiveness of treatment of patients with cysts of the maxillary sinus, who are scheduled for dental implantation.
Material and Methods: The results of dental implantation in 124 patients with maxillary sinus cysts were studied in order to substantiate the feasibility of removing, before sinuslifting, not only cysts accompanied by complaints but also those located at a distance of 10 mm from the planned implantation site.
Results: The frequency of Schneider membrane perforation during sinuslifting was observed in 12.1% of patients. Removing the cysts located within 10 mm from the dental implantation site before sinuslifting reduced the frequency of Schneider membrane perforations by 2.7 times and other complications by 3.7 times.
Conclusion: When determining the treatment tactics for patients with maxillary sinus cysts to whom dental implantation is planned, the localization of the cyst in the sinus and its relationship between the ostiomeatal complex and the site of dental implantation should be taken into account. Removal of cysts of the maxillary sinus, located above the site of the planned dental implantation and within 10 mm from it, reduces the frequency of sinuslifting complications.

Keywords

cyst, maxillary sinus, dental implantation, subantral augmentation, complications.


Reference

  1. Haaga JR, Boll D. Computed Tomography & Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Whole Body. Elsevier. Health Sciences, 2016. 2904 p.
  2. Bal M, Salturk Z, Bal GC, Berkiten G, Atar Y, el al. Mucous Retention Cysts in the Paranasal Sinuses: A Retrospective Study. Otolaryngology Online Journal. 2016; 6(2). Available from: https://www.alliedacademies.org/articles/mucous-retention-cysts-in-the-paranasal-sinuses-a-retrospective-study.html.
  3. Alahverdiev SA. [Choosing optimal surgical approach to cyst of the maxillary sinuses]. [Dissertation]. Мoscow; 2011. 24 p. [In Russian].
  4. Piscunov GZ. [Procedures for maxillary sinus cyst removal]. Russian Rhinology. 2016; 1: 57-61. doi: 10.17116/rosrino201624157-61. [In Russian].
  5. Moon IJ, Lee JE, Kim ST, Han DH, Rhee CS, Lee CH, Min YG. Characteristics and risk factors of mucosal cysts in the paranasal sinuses. Rhinology. 2011;49(3):309-14.
  6. Lopatin AS, Nefedov VS. [Possibilities of endonasal endoscopic surgery in treatment of cysts of the maxillary sinus]. Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2000; 4:
    11-6. [In Russian].
  7. Semenov FV, Gorbonosov IV, Vartahjan MC. Symptomatology of the maxillary sinus cysts. Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2012; 1: 8-10. [In Russian].
  8. Kim J, Jang H. A review of complications of maxillary sinus augmentation and available treatment methods. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 45: 220-4. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.4.220.
  9. Sakkas A, Konstantinidis I, Winter K, Schramm A, Wilde F. Effect of Schneiderian membrane perforation on sinus lift graft outcome using two different
    donor sites: a retrospective study of 105 maxillary sinus elevation procedures. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2016; 5: Doc 11. Published
    2016 Mar 2.
  10. Shkorbotun Ya. [X-ray Features of the Mucoperiastole of the Alveolar Bay of the Maxillary Sinus, as a Risk Factor for Developing Intraoperative Complications in Subantral Bone Augmentation]. Ukraпnsʹkij Ñ›urnal medicini, bмologмп ta sportu. 2018; 3.1 (10): 199-206. doi: 10.26693/jmbs03.01.199. [In Ukrainian].
  11. Han JD, Cho SH, Jang KW, Kim SG, Kim JH, Kim BJ, et al. Lateral approach for maxillary sinus membrane elevation without bone materials in maxillary mucous retention cyst with immediate or delayed implant rehabilitation: case reports. Journal of Korean Association Oral and Maxillofac Surgery. 2017; 43(4): 276-81. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.4.276.
  12. Zhang S, Song Y, Wei H, Ren S. Cyst decreased in size post maxillary sinus floor augmentation surgery in diabetic patient: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015; 16: 171–3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.10.004.
  13. Shkorbotun YaV, Kuryk EG. [Pathology and morphological substantiation of the use of microdebrider systems in miniinvasive functional endoscopic sinus surgery]. Otorhinolaryngology. Eastern Europe. 2018; 8(3): 346-54. [In Russian].
  14. Andrej M, Grjibovski AM, Ivanov SV, Gorbatova MA. [Descriptive statistics using statistica and spss software]. Science & Healthcare. 2016; 1. [In Russian]. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/opisatelnaya-statistika-s-ispolzovaniem-paketov-statisticheskih-programm-statistica-i-spss.
  15. Bakotina AV, Vischnyakov VV, Panin AM. [Maxillary sinusitis in subantral plastic. Prevention and treatment]. Medical alphabet. 2017; 2(11): 9-12. [In Russian].
 

© 2019, Public Organization «Ukrainian Scientific Medical Society of Otorhinolaryngologists»