SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL JOURNAL

| укр | рус |

 

 


No6(4) 2021

Back to the issue


DOI 10.37219/2528-8253-2021-6-04

Zabolotnyi DI, Lutsenko VI, Bieliakova IA, Kholodenko TYu, Vinnichuk PV,
Hradiuk NM, Shevchenko TO
Psycho-emotional state of patients with cochleovestibular disorders occurred under stress conditions
Zabolotny Dmitry I.
State Institution “O.S. Kolomiychenko Institute of Otolaryngology of National Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine”; Kyiv, Ukraine. Director
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Academician of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine
E-mail: amtc@kndio.kiev.ua
https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=6701512931
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9429-4414

Lutsenko Viktor I.
State Institution “O.S. Kolomiychenko Institute of Otolaryngology of National Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine”; Kyiv, Ukraine
Head of Laboratory of Clinical Audiology and Vestibulology
Doctor of Medical Sciences
E-mail: vil1954@ukr.net
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6517-2223
Scopus Author ID: 57222327855

Belyakova Irina A.
State Institution “O.S. Kolomiychenko Institute of Otolaryngology of National Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine”; Kyiv, Ukraine
Laboratory of Clinical Audiology and Vestibulology
Leading researcher
PhD
E-mail: irina1954tolay@gmail.com

Kholodenko Tetiana Yu.
State Institution “O.S. Kolomiychenko Institute of Otolaryngology of National Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine”; Kyiv, Ukraine
Scientific Secretary
E-mail: amtc@kndio.kiev.ua
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6578-5799
Scopus Author ID: 6506250388

Vinnichuk Pavlo V.
State Institution “O.S. Kolomiychenko Institute of Otolaryngology of National Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine”; Kyiv, Ukraine
Acting head of Department of Pediatric ENT Pathology
PhD
E-mail: vipinlov@gmail.com

Hradiuk Nataliya M.
State Institution “O.S. Kolomiychenko Institute of Otolaryngology of National Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine”; Kyiv, Ukraine
Laboratory of Clinical Audiology and Vestibulology
Junior Researcher
E-mail: svr_lor@ukr.net
ORCID ID:  https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1298-6420

Shevchenko Tetiana O.
State Institution “O.S. Kolomiychenko Institute of Otolaryngology of National Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine”; Kyiv, Ukraine.
Ear Microsurgery and Otoneurosurgery Department
Junior Researcher
Candidate of Medical Sciences
E-mail: nuha1977@ukr.net
Orchid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4338-3202

Abstract

Topicality: Dizziness is one of the most common symptoms in medical practice. This symptom can be caused by many diseases. One factor which is contributing to dizziness is mental disorders (including depression and anxiety). The problem of psychoemotional stress in recent decades is becoming increasingly important in the world. The COVID-19 pandemic, which was declared by the WHO in 2020, substantially deepened that problem.
Numerous studies show that persons of working age suffer most from psychoemotional stress. An urgent task is a selection of scales and questionnaires for persons with dizziness caused by chronic stress.
Aim: to increase the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment of cochleovestibular disorders that caused under stress conditions and develop the rehabilitation events.
Materials and methods: 95 patients aged 18 to 59 years were examined with complaints of dizziness caused by stress conditions and 20 people in the control group. 52 patients from main group also complained of tinnitus and 35 of hearing loss.
The following studies were carried out for patients: audiometry in full, listening adaptation, detection tests for central auditory disorders, impedance measurement, short-patent auditory induced potentials (CSVP), vestibulometry.
The questionnaire was conducted on the following scales: the questionnaire "Comprehensive Stress Assessment" (by Shcherbatykh YuV), the Hospital scale of Anxiety and depression (HADS), the Quality of Life Assessment Scale (by Chaban AS) and the Holmes and Reich social adaptation scale.
Non-parametric methods were used for statistical analysis. The difference in comparing of the two independent aggregates was considered valid at p < 0.05.
Results: All patients with psychogenic dizziness were divided into three groups depending on the severity of stress. The first group included 21 people (22.1%) with moderate stress, the second group – 35 patients (36.8%) with fairly pronounced stress, and at the third group were 39 people (41.1%) in a state of severe stress (but 10 of them are on the verge of exhaustion of the body's adaptive forces). The average indicators obtained during the questionnaire for the inquirer "Comprehensive stress assessment" in the 1st group were 9.0 (10.5-7) points, in the 2nd group – 17.5 (21-14.5) points and in the 3rd group – 34.0 (28-41.5).
The results of the Hospital Anxiety Scale and Depression (HADS) questionnaire are: in 1st group more than half of the subanxiety scale studies was normal; none of the subjects showed clinically pronounced depression and only 3 of them (14.3%) showed subclinically pronounced depression. In group 2nd the anxiety component is more pronounced with a predominance of clinically expressed anxiety; depression was diagnosed only in 37.1% with a predominance of subclinically pronounced depression. In the 3rd group on the anxiety sub-scale, the normal results had only 2 persons (5.1%), moreover, clinical anxiety was prevalent in most patients. In according with subscale of depression, about a third of patients have normal indicators and almost half of the subjects tested have subclinically pronounced depression.
According to the Holmes and Reich Social Adaptation Scale, in most cases (57 patients) there was low level of stress, 31 people had an average level of stress and only 7 had a high.
The results of the assessment of life quality according to the Chaban A. S. scale: in eight categories, life quality indicators decreased inversely in proportion to the increase in the severity of stress. The best indicators were obtained in the category of satisfaction with living conditions. The worst indicators are in the categories of satisfaction with physical condition and love.
Conclusions: 36.8% of the studied ones have quite pronounced stress of emotional and physiological systems, 41.1% - state of severe stress and 10.5% - exhaustion of the body's adaptive forces.
Patients with dizziness that was caused by stress should be interviewed using validated scales: the questionnaire "Comprehensive Stress Assessment", the Hospital Anxiety Scale and Depression (HADS) and the Quality of Life Assessment Scale. The use of other scales to determine the psychoemotional state and quality of life of such patients is the subject for further researches.
In according with used questionnaires from 7.4 (Holmes and Reich Scale of Social Adaptation) up to 78.9% (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)) of working-age persons who were under stress, except for otolaryngological treatment, in need of a medical psychologist. These measures will provide an opportunity to increase the speed of the treatment process and improve patient’s quality of life.

Keywords

psychogenic dizziness, chronic stress, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Quality of Life Assessment Scale.


Reference

  1. Neuhauser HK. Epidemiology of dizziness and vertigo. Nervenarzt. 2009;80(8):887-94.
    doi: 10.1007/s00115-009-2738-9.
  2. Neuhauser HK. The epidemiology of dizziness and vertigo. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;137:67-82.
    doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63437-5.00005-4.
  3. Murdin L, Schilder AGM. Epidemiology of balance symptoms and disorders in the community: a systematic review. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(3):387-92. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000691.
  4. Chan Y. Differential diagnosis of dizziness. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;17(3): 200-3.
    doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32832b2594.
  5. Wipperman J. Dizziness and vertigo. Prim Care. 2014;41(1):115-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2013.10. 004.
  6. Karatas M. Central vertigo and dizziness: epidemiology, differential diagnosis, and common causes. Neurologist. 2008;14(6):355-64. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e31817533a3.
  7. Post RE, Dickerson LM. Dizziness: a diagnostic approach. Am Fam Physician. 2010;82(4):361-8.
  8. Bazarov VG. [Clinical vestibulometry]. Kyiv: Zdorovia; 1988. 200 p. [In Russian].
  9. Dieterich M, Staab JP, Brandt T. Functional (psychogenic) dizziness. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;139:447-68. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-801772-2.00037-0.
  10. Popkirov S, Staab JP, Stone J. Persistent posturalperceptual dizziness (PPPD): a common, characteristic and treatable cause of chronic dizziness. Pract Neurol. 2018;18(1):5-13. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2017-001809.
  11. Kelm Z, Klapchar K, Kieliszak CR, Selinsky C. Psychogenic Dizziness: An Important but Overlooked Differential Diagnosis in the Work up of the Dizzy Patient. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2018;118(5):e22-e27. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2018.066.
  12. Roh KJ, Kim MK, Kim JH, Son EJ. Role of Emotional Distress in Prolongation of Dizziness: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Audiol Otol. 2017;22 (1):6-12. doi: 10.7874/jao.2017.00290.
  13. McEwen BS. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators: central role of the brain. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2006;8(4):367-81. doi: 10. 31887/DCNS.2006.8.4/bmcewen.
  14. Park CL, Russell BS, Fendrich M, Finkelstein-Fox L, Hutchison M, Becker J. Americans' COVID-19 Stress, Coping, and Adherence to CDC Guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(8):2296-2303. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05898-9.
  15. Yurieva LM, Shusterman TI. [COVID-19 Pandemic: Risks to Psychological Wellbeing and Mental Health]. Ukrains'kyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii. 2020;28(2):5-10. https://doi.org/10.36927/2079-0325-V28-is2-2020-1. [Article in Ukrainian].
  16. Stone AA, Schneider S, Broderick JE. Psychological stress declines rapidly from age 50 in the United States: Yet another well-being paradox. J Psychosom Res. 2017;103:22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.09.016.
  17. Sahu GK, Upadhyay S, Panna SM. Salivary alphaamylase activity in human beings of different age groups subjected to psychological stress. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2014;29(4):485-90. doi: 10.1007/s12291-013-0388-y.
  18. Shcherbatykh YuV. [Psychology of stress and methods of correction]. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2006. 256 p. [In Russian].
  19. Agaev NA, Kokun OM, Pishko IA, Lozinskaya NS, Ostapchuk VV, Tkachenko VV. [Collection of techniques for diagnosing negative mental states of servicemen]: Methodological guide. Kyiv: Scientific Research Center for Humanitarian Problems
    of the Armed Forces of Ukraine; 2016. 234 p. [In Ukrainian].
  20. Chaban OS, Khaustova OO, Bessheyko VG, Moskalenko OV. [Validation of the "Scale for assessing the quality of life"]. Ukrains'kyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii. 2017;25(1):159-60. [Article in Ukrainian].
  21. Holmes TH, Rahe RH. The Social Readjustment Rating Scale J Psychosom Res. 1967;11(2):213-8.
    doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(67)90010-4.
 

© 2019, Public Organization «Ukrainian Scientific Medical Society of Otorhinolaryngologists»